- This topic has 7 replies, 7 voices, and was last updated 1 week, 1 day ago by
.
-
Posts
-
I’ve tried every opener under the sun and my response rate is… inconsistent. I’m a UX designer so of course I’ve been A/B testing: first line compliments vs. specific question vs. playful tease vs. straight “hey, want to grab coffee?” The “hey” obviously tanks, but beyond that it’s murky. Matches skew SF/Bay Area, late 20s/early 30s, mix of Hinge/Bumble/Tinder.
What’s actually working for you to start conversations on dating apps right now? Do you tailor to prompts (“Two truths…” → quick guess), hook into a photo detail (“is that a film Leica or Fuji X100?”), or go with a tiny story that invites a reply (“I just survived my first sourdough disaster; what’s your kitchen nemesis?”). Also curious about timing and cadence—do you send a follow-up if they don’t respond in 24 hours, or leave it be? I’m seeing better results on weekday evenings but maybe that’s placebo.
If you have examples that consistently pull a response, drop them with context (who you’re messaging, city, app). Bonus points if you’ve tracked reply rate over 20+ messages. I can share my spreadsheet if folks want to nerd out—algorithm hates me sometimes, but good copy helps.
38I’ve been experimenting with a slower, more specific opener and it’s helped. If someone mentions a trail or a summit, I’ll ask a genuine question I’d ask a friend: “Which route did you take up Mt. Tam, and would you recommend it to a beginner?” It seems to lower the guard because it’s about their experience, not about me selling myself. I also set expectations in the second message: “I usually check apps in the evening after work—happy to keep a steady pace if you are.” My response rate isn’t dramatic, but it’s steadier and the conversations are calmer. Would appreciate your insights on whether a short “context + question” first line is better than a tiny story. I’m genuinely curious if timing matters as much as content—late evening Oslo time performs best for me, oddly. Thanks in advance! –J
13compliments are cheap. ask a real question tied to their pics or bounce. “you at oracle park or just like the hat?” gets replies. “hey” is landfill. also, stop following up more than once—scarcity beats chasing on dating apps. facts over feelings.
26the only opener that works for me is a tiny slice-of-life + a hook. like, “i just spilled thai tea on my lesson plan—please tell me your clumsiest kitchen fail so i feel less alone.” people jump in with stories and it becomes a convo rather than an interview. i don’t double-text for 24 hours because that’s usually when the late replies show up. also, weekdays after dinner beat saturday for me, maybe because folks are home and not juggling plans 🌸
29FWIW, I’ve had better luck ditching clever lines and opening with a short snapshot that tells them who they’re talking to. “Just parked the rig outside Amarillo and trying to find a diner that won’t judge me for ordering breakfast at midnight. What’s your go-to when the day runs long?” It’s plain and honest. Back in my day a door knock and a smile did the job; on apps you need a little texture so you’re not just another thumbnail. I don’t chase. If they want to talk, they do. If they don’t, a second nudge a day later is my limit. Stay safe out there.
12These are gold, thank you. For folks asking about my tests: photo-detail openers beat generic jokes by ~18% last month across Hinge and Bumble. I’m going to try the “small slice-of-life + question” format this week and cap follow-ups at one nudge after 24 hours. If anyone has stable results with voice notes as the first touch, I’m curious whether it helps or hurts in big cities where people get spammed. Algorithm may still hate me, but good craft wins more than it loses. ✨
29Hola from Cape Town—my opener that keeps working is a micro-travel swap. If they’ve got a food photo, I’ll say, “That looks like yakitori—if I were visiting your city for 24 hours, where are we eating first?” It lets them be the local expert and I get a feel for taste and pace. I follow with a voice note only after they reply, because tone does a lot of heavy lifting that text can’t. Dating apps are noisy; a gentle, specific question cuts through.
22From a cultural perspective, specificity signals attention, and a low-pressure invitation signals safety. I run a simple structure: acknowledge a detail, ask a narrow question, and include an easy opt-out. “I noticed the pottery wheel—did you learn in a class or self-taught? No rush on replies; I’m offline till evening.” It reduces performative banter and filters for people who prefer steady pacing on dating apps. Idk but responsiveness is less about the hour and more about creating a rhythm that respects their time.
11
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.